NR447-13730 Week 6

Purpose

The purpose of this direct care project is for learners to apply the nursing process to assess if the nursing care provided by professionally certified nurses will result in improved patient outcomes. This is Part 4 of 4 in the Direct Care Project.

Course Outcomes

This direct care project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: 

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)
CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

Part 1 enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)
CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)

Due Date for Part 4

Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6

Total Points Possible for Part 4

This assignment is worth a total of 200 points.

Late Assignment Policy

If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric below.

Preparing the Assignment

Directions for Part 4

1. View the Direct Care Project Part 4 Tutorial.
2. 1. Download the Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project template below.
   2. Gather the information from the surveys and attendance form.
   3. Complete the template with the following:
      1. Attendance form data
         1. Include names, titles, and organization
      2. Tables of results
         1. PRE-Survey and POST-Survey results in numerical form
      3. Interpretation of results
         1. Summarize data in the tables
         2. Include any positive or negative changes
      4. Reflection
         1. Overall experience
         2. Summary of outcomes from the pre and post surveys
         3. Gaps in project (Examples: What else would have been helpful? More data? Better resources?)
         4. Barriers to the project (Examples: participant interest, time, limited resources, willingness for change)
      5. Implications for future practice
         1. How could this project impact your professional practice?
   4. Submit the Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project template and the attendance form. The attendance form will be a separate submission in the grades area.

   Please note, your assignment will not be graded until the attendance form is submitted.

   Template

   Click on the link below to download your template.

   Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project Template (Download Here)Links to an external site.

   Best Practices

   • Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
   • Use the template provided. If the template is not used, a deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
   • Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. 
   • Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed.

   **Academic Integrity**

   Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

   By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

   Rubric

   NR447 – Direct Care Project Part 4 Evaluating the Project

   NR447 – Direct Care Project Part 4 Evaluating the Project

   Criteria	Ratings	Pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle and Tables of results 1. Title of presentation is present 2. PRE-Survey data is present in numerical form 3. POST-Survey data is present in numerical form 4. All survey questions addressed in data	45 pts Exceptional All criteria are met 1. Title of presentation is present 2. PRE-Survey data is present in numerical form 3. POST-Survey data is present in numerical form 4. Each question addressed in data   40 pts Exceeds Provides three of four criteria.   36 pts Meets Provides two of four criteria.   18 pts Needs Improvement Provides one of four criteria.   0 pts Developing Provides no criteria.	45 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation of results In comprehensive details, student 1. Summarized results of data 2. Identified positive or negative changes	50 pts Exceptional Summarizes in excellent detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.   44 pts Exceeds Summarizes in good detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.   40 pts Meets Summarizes in fair detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.   18 pts Needs Improvement Summarizes in minimal detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes   0 pts Developing Provides no criteria.	50 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Part 1 Reflection includes detailed description of: 1. Overall experience 2. Summary of outcome results	40 pts Exceptional Reflection includes detailed description of overall experience and summary of outcome results.   35 pts Exceeds Reflection includes description of overall experience and summary of outcome results but lacks details in one criterion.   32 pts Meets Reflection includes description of overall experience and summary of outcome results but lacks details in both criteria   15 pts Needs Improvement Missing one criterion.   0 pts Developing Provides no experience or summary.	40 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Part 2 Reflection includes detailed description of: 1. Barriers to project 2. Gaps in the project 3. Implications for future practice	40 pts Exceptional Reflection includes detailed description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice.   35 pts Exceeds Reflection includes description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice, but lacks details in one criterion.   32 pts Meets Reflection includes description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice, but lacks details in 2-3 criteria.   15 pts Needs Improvement Missing 1-2 criteria.   0 pts Developing Provides no barriers, gaps or implications.	40 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism Professionalism includes: 1. Correct spelling 2. Readable 3. Uses complete sentences 4. Proper grammar	25 pts Exceptional Meets all four criteria: 1. Correct spelling 2. Readable 3. Uses complete sentences 4. Proper grammar   22 pts Exceeds Does not meet one criterion.   20 pts Meets Does not meet 2 criteria.   8 pts Needs Improvement Does not meet 3 criteria.   0 pts Developing Does not meet all criteria.	25 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Used	0 pts No points deducted Correct Template Used   0 pts Points deducted – 20 Points Deducted (10% deduction) 20 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used.	0 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction	0 pts No points deducted Submitted on time   0 pts Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day) 1 day late = 10 Deduction; 2 day late = 20 Deduction; 3 day late = 30 Deduction; 4 day late = 40 Deduction; 5 day late = 50 Deduction; 6 day late = 60 Deduction; 7 day late = 70 Deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late	0 pts
   Total Points: 200